An Inkling of Transcendence: Lewis and Tolkien


Despoitphotos Image ID: 121201272 Copyright: chrisdorney

“[His] father had taught him to absorb doubt and disbelief into his beliefs.”

This statement from the book, Inklings, by Humphrey Carpenter, is spoken of Charles Williams, who was a regular participant in the informal discussion group, the Inklings, formed by CS Lewis and JRR Tolkien at the University of Oxford, England. The group met at various time in Lewis’s classroom and a local pub from the late 1930’s to late 1949. Charles Williams was an early member of the group and continued as a regular until his death in 1945. Williams grew up “a devout churchman” but was encouraged by his father “to appreciate the force of atheistic rationalism and to admire such men as Voltaire and Tom Paine”.

Lewis, of course, was an atheist when he began teaching at Oxford. His journey from a naturalistic worldview to agnosticism to Christian theism is chronicled in his autobiographical work, Surprised by Joy. Tolkien was already a Christian when Lewis joined him as a professor at Oxford, and Tolkien influenced Lewis in his transition to Christianity. Williams came along later. These men were attracted to each other as much by their love of language, literature and poetry as their faith, and their views on literature and faith often diverged sharply.

These three men, and others who joined them, were a powerhouse of thought and creativity. CS Lewis, of course, wrote many books from fiction to philosophy. JRR Tolkien wrote, perhaps, the greatest mythological series of the 20th century in the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings Trilogy. Charles Williams, though lesser known, was a prolific writer, literary critic, publisher and student of English literature who could recite hundreds of passages from sheer memory.

They influenced each other, despite their very distinct differences, and their collective influence has been felt by generations from their day to ours. They were Christian men, believing very authentically in the Bible as scripture, but they were also fierce academics who held their faith up to the rigors of intellectual exercise.

They were classicists, Tolkien more than Lewis, and Lewis more than Williams. That is they valued the ancient literature, and they took an ancient approach that assumed no tension between science and faith. They stood against the thrust of 19th and 20th century academics in this regard during which time science was chiefly carried on as if theology was never considered a science.

Theology was once considered the “queen of the sciences”[1] but began to take a backseat to science in the 18th century as scientists sought to approach science as a self-contained discipline. The divorce of science from theology, and the exile of theology from the realm of science is complete today. Science is now limited to the study of the natural world, but it wasn’t always so limited.

Over the course of these past two centuries, and slightly longer, worldviews have shifted in academic levels to a position that has raised science to an elite level, while theology has fallen out of favor, taking on second class citizenship at best and, in many a modern mind, has been relegated to the vagaries of superstition. Many people now contend that no reality exists but the natural world – and to that extent, science is the study of everything that exists.

If Lewis, Tolkien and Williams were millennials today, they would “call BS”.

Tolkien, Lewis and Williams opposed this view of reality that was already taking solid hold in the academia of the early 19th century. They argued forcefully for a more transcendent view of the world. Lewis is famous for saying that mind doesn’t come from matter, and an objective moral reality hangs on nothing if not for the existence of a Supreme Moral Law Giver. The three men were also united in their view of the importance of literature and myth, even pagan myths, which they would say carry some shadow of the reality of “real myth”.

Above all, these mean were intellectuals who were men of faith. They saw no tension between faith and reason or faith and science. The one informed the other, and they were rigorous in the application of facts to faith and faith to facts.

For them, a worldview must account for much more than what science can tell us about the natural world. A worldview must be able to account coherently for beauty, love, art, morality, the sense of purpose that men intuitively seek and the longing we all have for something this world never quite satisfies, among other things. Lewis was fond of saying that, while religion can account for science, the natural world, beauty, love, art, morality and purpose, science can only account for the natural world.

The natural instincts of finite beings are to worship things that cause us to respond with awe, and our finitude also leads us to doubt. The thinking man is naturally led to doubt because we don’t know what we don’t know. Our desire for certainty has caused some to shrink the universe to the size and scope of all that we can know through science, and from that position we declare that is all there is to know.

Reality, however, is not so provincial. Our worldview must be robust enough to make sense of things that transcend the natural world and honest enough to admit them. To venture out into the vast reality of the universe and to transcend it requires measures of faith, doubt, intellect and awe … and the honesty and integrity to hold them in tension.

Lewis, Tolkien and Williams were modern pioneers of that transcendent reality, the necessity of which is suggested by the natural world, itself, and all of our experiences that interact with it. While admitting all the facts that science reveals of the natural world, they were keenly aware of the insufficiency of science to account for the things that matter most. They found in literature, myth, poetry, beauty and, ultimately, the redemption story of the Christian Scripture, all the transcendence that makes sense of this natural world.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[1] See Theology … The Queen of the Sciences? Published online at Patheos, April 19, 2012

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: Christian, Culture, Faith, Literature

Tags: , , , , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

2 Comments on “An Inkling of Transcendence: Lewis and Tolkien”


  1. REALLY good article. I’m curious… do we have any modern-day Inklings equivalents of Lewis, Tolkien, and Williams?

    Liked by 1 person


    • Good question. In the book, the author talks about the fact that informal groups like The inklings ceased to be as popular around the time when the Inklings group broke up. It may be that those kinds of informal groups, mostly of men, are things of the past. On the other hand, my 22 year old son who is a theater kid and has a group of fellow theater kids, mostly guys, who get together and talk about theological, philosophical and other things on a regular basis. So maybe they haven’t died out after all!

      Like


Comments are welcomed

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: