Can We Be Certain of God’s Existence?


Depositphotos Image ID: 5872621 Copyright: ccaetano

Can we be certain of God s existence? The short answer is, no. If the question is whether we can have something like mathematical certainty or proof, we have to answer that question in the negative. There is no evidence, no proof or argument that can provide certainty that God exists for finite beings such as ourselves.

Such evidence, proof or argument would have to be built on premises that are 100% certain, and that kind of certainty is impossible for beings that are not all-knowing. The best we can do is to put forth evidence, proofs and arguments that suggest a probability that God exists – to show that the likelihood is more probable than not that God exists.

To this extent, doubt is the common experience of saints and sinners alike.

To put this another way: Can we be sure that God doesn’t exist? The only certainty is that we can’t be certain.

Many believers have doubts, and many nonbelievers have their own doubts.

For the believer, we find in the Scripture a God who embraces us in our doubts. When a man with a troubled son came to Jesus, Jesus asked him if he believed, and the man confessed, “I believe, help my unbelief”. Significantly, Jesus didn’t rebuke the man or turn him away because he doubts. Jesus responded by healing the man’s son. We can take comfort in God’s mercy, grace and love toward us in that demonstration of God’s character by Jesus.

From this story and other, similar provisions in the Bible, we should have confidence in taking our doubts to God in honest, heartfelt prayer. If our doubts influence us away from God, what is God going to do for us? But, if we come to God, even faltering in doubt, He will meet us and embrace us at our point of need.

Back to the subject at hand, “the idea of certainty is a will-o-the-wisp”, according to Dr. William Lane Craig, “that is irrelevant to Christian conviction. It sets up a false standard as to what knowledge is.”

The idea of certainty, as in mathematical accuracy, is an unrealistic standard in to apply to any proposition (outside of mathematics of course). There are very few things we can be certain of as finite beings, and many things we are certain of may not warrant our confidence. How many times have our children said to us with unmerited confidence, “I’ve got this!”

Arguments and proofs will always be based on premises that are less than certain. As long as they are more probable than not, we can have some degree of confidence in the conclusions, but real certainty is a naïve fantasy.

Certainty, in a colloquial sense, is more of a personal willingness to be swayed, than a proof on which we can be certain in a mathematical sense. What might convince me might not convince you. I might be willing to err on the side of this, while you might be willing to err on the side of its opposite. This is the human condition. We each have to find our own comfort levels where we are willing to repose our confidence.

For Dr. Craig, as for many people, we find more certainty in “the witness of the Holy Spirit” than in factual evidence and logical arguments. This is not to say that I would be content to believe in the face of contrary evidence. In fact, I wouldn’t! But, I don’t have anything like mathematical certainty, and I hold no illusions that I ever will.

Dr. Craig calls it a “non-rational certainty” that God exists. Note, however, that he didn’t say irrational.

The internal witness of the Holy Spirit  is a personal “proof”. It’s nothing that would convince the person sitting next to me. It’s personal to me. Others might call it subjective, but because the experience is so intimately personal, it satisfies me.

In truth, the “witness of the Holy Spirit” isn’t a purely subjective experience. We might entertain doubts that it is, but we find some confidence in the fact that others have shared the same experience. When we share notes with others, we find remarkable similarities among the intimately personal experiences. In fact, we share the experience with the Holy Spirit in common with all Christians who claim to be born again since the apostle Paul first said, “the Spirit testifies with our spirit” (Romans 8:16).

Jesus actually promised the Holy Spirit to us as a Helper “to be with you forever … for he dwells with you and will be in you…. the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.” (John 14:16-17, 26) Other ways of describing the phenomenon of the Holy Spirit is the idea of being “filled with the Spirit”. (See Micah 3:8; Luke 1:41; Acts 2:4; Acts 6:3; Acts 7:5; Acts 9:7; Acts 11:24; Acts 13:9, 52; and Ephesians 5:18. Paul also describes the experience as being “sealed with the Holy Spirit”:

“when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, [you] were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit, who is the guarantee of our inheritance until we acquire possession of it….” (Ephesians 1:13-14)

Following is the insightful observations of a former New Age adherent comparing his experience with the Holy Spirit to his experiences with New Age meditation, astral projection and other such things. He was not just any New Age follower; he used to run one of the largest, most commercially profitable New Age websites on the Internet. Listen to his description of experiencing the Holy Spirit:


 


In response to the question, whether we can have certainty that God exists, the long answer is a qualified, yes!

That certainty, however, won’t come through evidence, arguments or logic, though the existence of God isn’t antithetical to evidence, argument or logic. Those tools can point us toward God. They can, and I believe they do, suggest that the existence of God is more likely than not. Those tools can and have convinced many very intelligent people that God’s existence is more probable than not, but those tools can’t give mathematical certainty to finite creatures such as ourselves because we don’t ultimately know what we don’t know.

When we read through the Old Testament, we see the people of Israel continuously reminded of the miraculous things that God did for them – the parting of the Red Sea, for instance – and they are continually reminded to recall these things to assuage their doubts. More often than not, they failed to be convinced, not unlike many of us today. The difference for us, though, is that the “proof” of God’s existence and beneficence toward us is not in the outward display of the miraculous (for most of us), but in the inward witness of the Holy Spirit. That inward witness is more subtle, nuanced and ethereal, but it is also more sure because we carry it with us.

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: Apologetics, Faith, Holy Spirit, Philosophy

Tags: , , , , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

12 Comments on “Can We Be Certain of God’s Existence?”

  1. Robert Says:

    “I refuse to prove that I exist because proof denies faith and without faith I am nothing!” -The nonexistent God

    Like


  2. Not sure if you are aware of this… certainty cannot be found ANYWHERE… not even mathematics. Google Kurt Godel’s incompleteness theorem which basically put the nail in the coffin in hoping certainty could be found in mathematics.

    Liked by 1 person


    • Good point Tom. Though, that isn’t the way science is popularly portrayed.

      Like


    • That’s true as far as it goes Thomas, and I would not dispute its significance per se, But its practically relatively insignificant. You assume virtually everything a reasonable proof must have to post here to us, as do I. Once one confirms reality , experience and change.. as we all do.. every single one of us.. practically if not theoretically.. then Prof Ed Feser’s proofs and the existence of God become simply obvious. Rather like free will. If we have free will ( a precondition of freely investigating the question!) then something about us cannot be physical. Something about us is “spiritual” .. an active principle that is not reducible to physics. Once one sees that we are indeed spiritual (Minds over matter.. as we live life out) and if we assume cause and effect.. which is necessary to do anything… then it is again just obvious that SomeOne Spiritual.. is the ground of all being. One has to reject causality to hold otherwise. Which means.. stop everything you do because it all shows we all accept causality. You certainly have reasonable certainty in the very obvious existence of God.

      Liked by 1 person


    • Are you certain of Godel’s incompleteness theorem? If not are you certain are you certain you should be? Numbers are accidental properties of things and all things are understood in a limited way as they are all grounded in absolute Being.. God Who is infinite and beyond us for that reason intellectually. But I think we can certainly be certain of God’s quite obvious existence beyond any reasonable doubt for all practical purposes.

      Liked by 1 person


  3. Why are people so hung up in search of mathematical certainty of God’s existence… but have NOT problem with accepting the uncertainty inherent in quantum physics?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Pete Says:

    “The difference for us, though, is that the “proof” of God’s existence and beneficence toward us is not in the outward display of the miraculous (for most of us), but in the inward witness of the Holy Spirit” I think that depends on how you look at mercy and grace. Is it not a miracle that our bodies are put together the way they are? Or that the entire food chain exists the way it does? Is it not a miracle that this earth is exactly where it needs to be to sustain our life? Is it not a miracle that our sins are washed away by one man’s sacrificial love?

    I see what I call miracles every day in acknowledging God in all things. As far as being certain f His existence, the very heavens shout out the existence of God, and everything in this world and the way it functions show there is a grand designer. No way this could happen by chance! His oproof of existence is written all around us. Oh, Lord, open our eyes!

    Wonderful post – very thought provoking.

    Be blessed

    Like


  5. I think the existence of God is demonstrated by the standard Aristotelian- based proofs. If one accepts mathematical “certainties” then one should if consistent accept the classic traditional proofs. Mathematical “certainty” presumes existence and intelligibility, the powers of reason and sense experience. Aristotelian proofs assume the same. Ed Feser does a nice job with these matters. I personally think that if one isn’t into Aquinas or Aristotle.. one is missing the intellectual boat that floated the west. Here is professor Ed’s excellent short proof.. demonstration. God is not a hypothesis.. He is the reason and final cause of hypothesi. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAIHs5TJRqQ

    Liked by 1 person


Comments are welcomed

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


%d bloggers like this: