Sean McDowell did his doctoral dissertation on the fate of the Apostles of Jesus. Legend has it that they all died as martyrs, except for the Apostle John, because they witnessed the death and resurrection of Jesus and were willing to attest to it with their own deaths.
But is that really true? That is the question Sean McDowell set out to answer with scholarly research and analysis.
Church “tradition” maintains that all the apostles, except for John, were martyred. This is my understanding also, more or less, going back many years, though we may not have historical evidence that comports with modern standards to support what happened to all the Apostles.
The deaths of Peter and Paul are pretty well-attested. They died martyrs’ deaths, but what about the others?
Sean McDowell recently did a short video inspired by the results of his doctoral study, A Historical Evaluation of the Evidence for the Death of the Apostles As Martyrs for Their Faith, and the book, The Fate of the Apostles. While his study reveals we lack evidence that meets a standard of modern historiography about the martyrdom of most of the apostles, we have solid evidence for least two of them, and we have some evidence for the martyrdom of other eyewitnesses of the death of Jesus. From these facts, McDowell raises five key points.
The first point is the definition of an apostle. What makes apostles different from disciples?
In the beginning of the Book of Acts, the 11 remaining apostles are looking to replace Judas who betrayed Jesus, as the story is told in Acts 1:12-26. They used two criteria to choose a replacement. First, they decided that the replacement would have to be someone who was with Jesus since his baptism by John the Baptist. Second, the replacement had to be an eyewitness of the risen Jesus. (Acts 1:21-22)
The eyewitness criterion is relevant to this discussion because of the emphasis on the importance of eyewitness as opposed to secondhand testimony. Not only the apostles, but many people claimed to have seen Jesus risen from the dead. (Paul identifies over 500 people to whom Jesus appeared in the order in which he appeared to them in 1 Corinthians 15:3-8.) The catalogue of eyewitnesses was important to early Christians.
The second point is that the earliest message the apostles preached was that Jesus had risen from the dead. This was the foundation of the message of the early followers of Jesus. We see this in the letters of Paul and the preaching that is recorded in the Book of Acts. The message they gave was always centrally tied to the resurrection.
The third point is that the Apostles maintained that Jesus rose from the dead in direct opposition to the Jewish authorities and Roman state. When the apostles testified that Jesus is God, they were essentially saying that Caesar is not God. Jesus died as a criminal against the Roman state, so they were essentially saying that a criminal against the Roman state was the risen Lord. This message made them enemies not only of the Jews, but of the Roman state.
The fourth point is that the apostles would not stop speaking publicly about the risen Jesus even when they were threatened, beaten and thrown in prison. Following the Day of Pentecost, the apostles began to speak publicly, and many people began to join them. It wasn’t long before two of the apostles were hauled before the religious council and ordered to stop, but they didn’t stop. They they went on publicly proclaiming the same message boldly.
Though they were arrested, they refused to stop. Stephen, who wasn’t even an apostle, was killed for preaching to a crowd. These early Christian preachers were hunted down, imprisoned and tortured, but they went on publicly speaking about Jesus being resurrected from the dead.
Paul, who headed up the effort to stop them from speaking, became a believer when Jesus appeared personally to him. Paul, the once persecutor of the faithful, became an unrelenting witness to the resurrection of Jesus though he himself was stoned, beaten and imprisoned.
Most of the suffering the early apostles received came at the hands of the Jews, but that changed as time went on. Paul was beaten and imprisoned by Roman authorities in Philippi. In Thessalonica, they were accused of “acting against the decrees of Caesar” (Acts 7:17) (because they were claiming Jesus was a king). Paul was eventually imprisoned by the Romans and removed to Rome were he lived the rest of his life in captivity before he was ultimately put to death by order of the Caesar, Nero.
Many of these things are documented by Luke, the historian, in Acts. The death of James, the brother of Jesus, was recorded by the Jewish historian, Josephus,. Regardless of whether we accept the more legendary and apocryphal stories of the deaths of other Apostles, we have a reliable record that multiple followers of Jesus were willing to suffer and die for the message they publicly proclaimed – the message that Jesus rose from the dead.
The last point is that there is good, historical evidence that some of the apostles and key followers died as martyrs for this message. Stephen’s death is recorded in Acts. The martyrdom of James, the brother of Jesus, the head of the church in Jerusalem, was reported by Josephus, the Jewish/Roman historian in his writings at the end of the first century. James, the brother of John, was killed by sword at the hands of Herod.
We also have good documentation of the death of Paul and Peter. According to the early church fathers and apocryphal books, Paul was beheaded in Rome by order of Nero, and Peter was crucified also by order of Nero. In fact Nero, triggered the beginning of a widespread and focused persecution of Christians by the Roman Empire that lead to the death of untold numbers of Christians as martyrs in the centuries that followed.
Many are the stories of the deaths of the other apostles by martyrdom, but the sources are not as well-attested as the sources for the death of Stephen, James, the brother of John, Peter and Paul. Foxe’s Book of Martyrs (published by John Day in 1563) famously preserves those stories. While it purported to retell the martyr stories of the apostles, among other ancient Christians, it focused particularly on the martyrs in England and Scotland. The book was updated periodically for many years into the early nineteenth century.
While Foxe’s Book of Martyrs doesn’t have the hallmarks of modern historical reliability and was influenced by a motive to tie the history of the Reformation to the martyrdom of the Apostles and early church fathers, no one can seriously argue the willingness of many a Christian witness over the ages to die for what they believed.
Sean McDowell acknowledges in a video he did summarizing his research that people of other faiths, like Muslims, for instance, have also demonstrated a willingness to die for their faith. Apart from the very first martyrs, the criticism is legitimate that Christians can claim no special place over other faiths on the basis of martyrdom. (Martyrdom, though, seems to have a particular prominence in Christian history that is different in degree and quality.)
The martyrdom of the earliest followers of Christ, however, establishes a claim that no other religion can make. These people claimed as a fundamental matter to be eyewitnesses of the death of Jesus, the man they claimed was God in the flesh. On Paul’s account, hundreds of people claimed to have witnessed his death and claimed to have witnessed Jesus risen from the dead and appearing among them.
These people, personally, were in the position to know, by their firsthand experience, that Jesus died. The same people who witnessed his death claimed to have witnessed Jesus appearing to them, risen from the dead. In other words, these people didn’t simply believe on second or third hand information; they claimed to witness Jesus firsthand appearing them in the flesh after they saw him die.
If they were making up the fact that Jesus rose from the dead and appeared to them, would they have been willing to die for such a lie?
Most scholars acknowledge the rhetorical nature of that question and don’t argue (any longer) that the early followers made up the story. It just doesn’t square with common sense and human nature. It’s too unbelievable to be considered a viable position.
Of course, modern skeptics may say that these people could have been honestly mistaken. That’s a possibility of course, but more than 500 people at one time? (We don’t have time to get into this point, but there many, many examples of people who have tackled this subject.)
The message that was central to this movement of the first followers of Jesus was that he rose from the dead. Everything hangs on that message. Without that fact, Paul says, our faith is “useless” and “futile”. (1 Corinthians 15:14, 17) The first followers of Jesus staked everything on that message, and they backed up their confidence with a willingness to be persecuted, threatened, beaten, mocked and even killed for it.
No other religion can claim this kind of commitment from people who were in the position to know the truth of such an extraordinary claim. While we can’t really claim with any degree of modern, historical assurance that all the apostles died a martyr’s death, some of them did, along with others, like Stephen and James, the brother of Jesus. This is a remarkable fact given their position to know exactly what they were dying for.
 In 1 Corinthians 15, for instance, Paul recounts all the people who saw Jesus risen from the dead, including over 500 men who apparently all saw Jesus at the same time, and Paul adds: “But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. 14 And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain.” (1 Cor. 15:13-14) Scholars note that Paul recites from a credal tradition that goes back to a very short time after the death of Jesus bearing the message that Jesus rose from the dead. (See The Message in the Earliest Creeds in the New Testament)
 See Acts 2:14-40; Acts 3:12-26; Acts 4:5-12; Acts 10:34-47; Acts 13:16-41; Acts 17:22-35; Acts 22:1-21; Acts 24:10-21; and Acts 26:2-23.
 See Acts 4:1-27
 See Acts 5:17-42
 See Acts 6:8-15 and Acts 7
 See Acts 8:1-4
 See Acts 14:19-23
 Acts 12:1-2
 1 Clement (95-96 AD (cited in McDowell, Sean (2016), The Fate of the Apostles: Examining the Martyrdom Accounts of the Closest Followers of Jesus, Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-03190-1); Ignatius, Letter to the Ephesians, Chapter XII (around 110 AD); The Acts of Paul (see James, Montague Rhodes (1924) The Acts of Paul: The Apocryphal New Testament (Oxford: Clarendon Press)) (around 160 AD); Dionysius of Corinth letter to the Romans (177-174 AD)( “Fragments from a Letter to the Roman Church Chapter III”)(cited also by Eusebius); Quintus Septimius Florens, Tertullian, “Prescription Against Heretics Chapter XXXVI” (200 AD); Eusebius of Caesarea, Church History Book II Chapter 25:5–6 (320) AD); Lactantius, Of the Manner in Which the Persecutors Died, addressed to Donatus Chapter II (318 AD); Jerome, On Illustrious Men Chapter 5 (392 AD); John Chrysostom, Concerning Lowliness of Mind 4 (349-407); and Sulpicius SeVerus, Chronica II, 28–29 (403 AD).
 See Clement, The First Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians (99 AD); Apocryphal Acts of Peter Chapter 37 (after 100 AD); Quintus Septimius Florens, Tertullian (155-204 AD), Prescription Against Heretics Chapter XXXVI and Scorpiace Chapter 15; Origen, Sermon by Leo the Great (440–461) (quoting Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History (III, 1)); Peter of Alexandria (d. 311 AD), Canonical Epistle on Penitence Canon 9; and Jerome (327-420 AD), De Viris Illustribus (On Illustrious Men) Chapter 1.
 You can read it online here.
4 thoughts on “The Martyrdom of the Apostles”
Sorry for the typos. Have to start paying more attention.
Just my two cents but relying on Paul’s report that 500 saw Jesus always pretty thin to me. Nobody has any idea where he got that from or how many steps removed from the event that report was. He may very well have believed what he was saying, although inflating numbers or including a proof that supports our belief even if we haven’t checked it, out is not uncommon, but that doesn’t make it correct. Of course, I don’t know your who your audience is so it may not matter.
I appreciate the comment. Paul’s statement is made about 20 or so years after the death of Jesus. While it probably isn’t mathematically accurate, that number suggests hundreds of people who claimed to see Jesus in the flesh after he died, and certainly some of those people were still alive to confirm it. That’s a significant number, and the fact that Paul is obviously relying on them as proof in referring to them is significant. Almost all scholars agree that Paul was sincere. Nothing else fits with his dramatic turnaround.