How Do We Know God is a Personal Being?

Depositphotos Image ID: 146490813 Copyright: SergeyNivens

Many people are not willing to trust the Bible. They are not sure whether God exists or who, or what, God might be. Bur, we don’t need the Bible to determine whether God exists or that God is a Who, and not a What.

Dr. William Lane Craig addresses the question: How do we know whether the cause of the universe (God) is a personal being? He explains that the conclusion is reached in at least three different ways.

First, he says, causal explanations can be of two types. They can be scientific explanations involving laws and initial conditions; or they can be personal explanations involving agents and volitional actions.

For example, if one walks into a kitchen with a person standing there and a kettle boiling and one asks the person, “Why is the kettle boiling?” The person might answer, “Because the heat of the flames under the kettle are being conducted by the copper bottom of the kettle to the water, causing the molecules in the water to vibrate more violently until they throw off the energy in the form of steam.” The person might also answer, “I put the kettle on to make a cup of tea. Would you like some too?”

One is a scientific explanation. The other is a personal explanation. Both of them are equally legitimate causal explanations. In some contexts, one explanation would be inappropriate, while the other would be appropriate.

When it comes to the first state of the universe, science, the study of physical world, can’t explain the cause of the universe based on initial conditions and natural laws because the universe, itself, is the first physical state. There is nothing prior to it. There is no prior state of natural laws from which the natural laws can be explained. Thus, the only kind of causal explanation is an explanation that involves an agent with volition – a personal Creator.

Second, the cause of the material universe which had a beginning must be timeless, space-less, changeless and immaterial. Only two possible explanations are available. Those explanations include an abstract objects or an unembodied mind/consciousness.

Abstract objects, like numbers, are timeless, space-less, changeless and immaterial, but abstract objects don’t cause anything. By definition, abstract objects are abstract, disassociated from material objects. They have causal effect. The number seven (7), for instance, doesn’t cause anything to happen. Since abstract objects have no causal properties, the cause of the universe must be an unembodied mind or consciousness.

Finally, the only way to get an effect with a beginning from an eternal cause is from a volitional agent. This is so because, if a non-personal cause sufficient to produce an effect is always existent, the effect should also be always existent.

For instance, for instance, if the cause of water freezing is the temperature of the water being below zero degrees Celsius, then, if the temperature of water was zero degrees from eternity past, it would be impossible for the water to have begun to freeze a finite time ago. Any water that was around would be frozen from the eternity.

How does a permanent and eternal cause create an effect like the universe that began about 14 billion years ago (and, therefore, was not always present)? An eternal/permanent cause, absent some volitional act that creates a beginning, would produce an eternal/permanent effect with no beginning; but the universe had a beginning. The only satisfactory answer is that the cause was a person agent exercising freedom of will who can create a new effect spontaneously without antecedent determining conditions.

For example, a man sitting from eternity could freely will to stand up. Only in this way (by volitional act) can an effect with a beginning arise from a permanent cause.

For the three reasons given, we can deduce that the universe did not simply arise from an uncaused first cause. That uncaused first cause must have been a volitional agent, a personal being who chose freely to bring the universe into existence. God, therefore, is a personal being.

Explore posts in the same categories: creation, Philosophy

Tags: , , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

Comments are welcomed

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: